Megachurch Pastor John Hagee Solemnly Admits to “Crankin Hog All Crazy Style” and “Slurpin Down Lean”

The tape runs fifty-one minutes and forty-four seconds. Reality Daily has it in full, from the ministry's own house feed, downloaded from the ministry's own public archive, unedited and unclipped, and this desk has now watched it end to end eleven times — a number we did not choose and noticed only afterward, when the log was totaled.

It is a Sunday evening sermon. It was recorded before roughly twenty-two hundred people at Cornerstone Church in San Antonio, Texas, carried live at 8:00 p.m. Central on the ministry's network and on eleven affiliate stations, and archived within ninety minutes of its conclusion. Its subject, per the printed order of service handed to every person who walked in that night, is the fourth sign in the heavens. Its title is “The Fourth Sign.” Nothing about that is unusual. John Hagee has been preaching the signs in the heavens for four decades, wrote the 2013 bestseller Four Blood Moons: Something Is About to Change, saw it made into a film, and has never once been coy about what he believes the sky is doing.

At six minutes and twelve seconds into the broadcast, he departs from the printed order of service and begins to speak about himself as a young man. He does this in the full King James thunder, with the choir behind him, building. He speaks of the wilderness years. He speaks of the appetites of a younger man and the seasons before the sign. And then, at the top of the crescendo, he lands — flatly, without irony, without a change in register, without any indication whatsoever that he considers the words unusual — on two phrases.

He was, in his own words, “crankin hog all crazy style.” He was “slurpin down lean.”

Then he goes to the moon. He does this eleven times in fifty-one minutes and forty-four seconds. The Standards Desk has counted all eleven and printed the timestamps below, and we have done this not because we find it amusing — we would ask readers to take that on faith, since we cannot prove a state of mind — but because counting things is what this desk is for, and because nobody else has counted them.

“I was crankin hog all crazy style. I was slurpin down lean. And then, beloved, I looked up — and the moon was red as blood, and something was about to change.”— Broadcast SES-2440, timecode 50:51, transcript lines 1,479–1,484

I. The Broadcast

The program carries the designation SES-2440 in the ministry's archive. It was recorded on the evening of Sunday, 16 August. Reality Daily downloaded the file on 22 August at 4:11 p.m. Eastern, retained the hash, retained the download log, and has not altered a frame. The file we watched is the file the ministry published. We want that established before anything else in this story is read, because it will be the first thing disputed and it is the one thing we can prove.

We also obtained the printed order of service for that evening. It runs to two pages, it was handed out at four doors, and it is the least ambiguous document in this investigation. It lists the sermon by title. It allots the sermon thirty-four minutes.

The sermon runs fifty-one minutes and forty-four seconds. It is seventeen minutes and forty-four seconds longer than the piece of paper that announced it, which is not by itself remarkable — pastors run long, and the Standards Desk has no view on how long a sermon ought to be — but which becomes a fact once you ask what occupies the extra seventeen minutes.

The order of service does not mention a confession. It does not mention the young manhood of anybody. It lists, after the sermon, a benediction and a closing hymn, and both of these occurred, on schedule, and the hymn was “It Is Well With My Soul.”

II. Eleven Occurrences, Timed

The Standards Desk logs every broadcast it examines against a running timecode taken from the file itself rather than from any published run sheet. The count is eleven. Both phrases, delivered together, in that order, within the same breath group, eleven separate times.

• 06:12 — first occurrence. Moon referenced at 06:19.
• 09:48 — moon at 09:57.
• 14:03 — moon at 14:11.
• 18:37 — moon at 18:44.
• 22:19 — moon at 22:27, after a sustained choir figure of four seconds.
• 27:55 — moon at 28:14. Longest interval in the broadcast; our log records nineteen seconds of congregational response.
• 31:40 — moon at 31:46.
• 36:08 — moon at 36:15.
• 41:22 — moon at 41:24. Shortest interval: one point eight seconds.
• 47:16 — moon at 47:23.
• 50:51 — moon at 51:04. Final occurrence. Thirty-eight seconds later the broadcast ends.

The mean interval from the second phrase to the first reference to the moon is six point four seconds. We have checked this arithmetic twice and had a fourth staffer check it, which is our practice and which has become, in this newsroom, a small joke that nobody explains to visitors.

Here is the finding, and we would ask that it be quoted in full rather than in half. There is no reference to the moon in the second half of this broadcast that is not preceded, within twenty seconds, by both phrases. Not one. He cannot get from the confession to the prophecy without going through those two phrases, and over fifty-one minutes he goes through them eleven times, and the route never varies.

III. The Pivot, Transcribed

What follows is taken from our own transcript, prepared under the desk's ordinary protocol. Bracketed material is descriptive and is ours. Everything unbracketed is his.

1412 HAGEE: There were seasons, beloved. There were

1413 seasons in the wilderness of a young man, and I

1414 will not stand in this pulpit and tell you that I

1415 walked them clean. I was crankin hog all crazy

1416 style. I was slurpin down lean. LOOK UP, beloved.

1417 The moon is red as blood.

That is the seventh occurrence, at 47:16. The register does not change. There is no pause before the phrases and no pause after them. He does not lower his voice for them and he does not raise it. Our four transcribers, working independently, all four marked the same absence of any tonal shift, which is the only thing in this section of tape on which all four agreed.

The fifth occurrence, at 22:19, is the most compressed:

0641 HAGEE: Crankin hog. All crazy style. Slurpin down

0642 lean. [CHOIR: sustained, 4 sec] And the fourth

0643 sign shall be given in the heavens.

And the eleventh, at 50:51, is the longest, the loudest, and the only one the congregation answers:

1479 HAGEE: I was crankin hog all crazy style.

1480 [CONGREGATION: response, 6 sec]

1481 I was slurpin down lean.

1482 [CONGREGATION: response, 9 sec]

1483 And then I looked up, and the moon was red as

1484 blood, and something was about to change.

Nine seconds of response. We timed the response.

IV. The Lexicon, and the Lexicographer

Standards Desk protocol requires that any term quoted from a broadcast be checked against the reference shelf before it is printed, so that we do not reproduce a term of art while believing it to be idiom, or the reverse. We checked. We checked four works: a standard theological wordbook in its fourth edition, a two-volume dictionary of biblical languages, a concordance of homiletic usage in North American evangelical preaching, 1870 to the present, and the ministry's own published glossary, which runs to eleven pages and is available as a download.

QUERY: crankin hog all crazy style — 0 RESULTS IN 4 WORKS

Neither phrase appears in any of the four. Neither appears in any variant spelling we could construct, and we constructed thirty-one. This is not evidence that the phrases are not theological. It is evidence that if they are theological, the reference works have not caught up, which happens, and which is why we wrote to the seminaries.

We wrote to two. The Chalmers Institute of Biblical Languages in Rock Hill, South Carolina, and the Danforth School of Divinity in Erie, Pennsylvania. Both were sent the two phrases in isolation, without the pastor's name, without the broadcast designation, and without any indication that a news organization was involved beyond the letterhead. Both were asked one question: does either of these phrases have a recognized usage in homiletic or scriptural context, and if so, what is it. Eleven written requests to each, by post and by electronic mail. Neither has replied. The twelfth request to each went out on 28 August, which under this paper's standards is the last one we send.

Internally, the Desk did what it always does with contested tape: four staffers transcribed the 47:00–48:00 minute independently, without conferring, and their transcripts were compared. No two matched. They disagreed on where the sentence ends, on whether the pause after “beloved” is a comma or a full stop, on whether “LOOK UP” is one emphatic or two, and on the total word count, by a spread of six words. This is not new; readers of our founding investigation will recall that three staffers summarized a four-paragraph fact-check and produced three incompatible summaries. It is why we do it.

All four transcripts contain both phrases. Identically. Same words, same order, same spelling, no hyphens, no apostrophes. Four people who could not agree on a comma agreed on “crankin hog all crazy style” without conferring, which is the strongest internal verification this desk has ever recorded on any piece of audio, and which we would trade in an instant for one sentence from either seminary.

We then retained Rowena Trask, who spent thirty-one years as a senior editor on a North American dictionary of record, the last nine of them on the citation file. She is retired and lives in Vermont. She was given the two phrases, in writing, with no context, and asked to describe them.

Her memorandum runs to four pages. On the first phrase, she is entirely straightforward. Crank, she writes, is a verb of long standing, attested from the fifteenth century in the mechanical sense of turning by hand, and productive in American vernacular in the sense of operating an implement vigorously and at length. Hog is Old English hogg and requires no gloss. The terminal element, she writes, is an adverbial intensifier of a construction well attested in twentieth-century American vernacular English, in which a manner adverbial is formed by suffixing the noun style to a modifier, and it is in her judgment the least interesting part of the phrase.

Her conclusion, printed in full:

“The phrase is well formed. Every element in it is English and every element is doing a job. It is grammatical, and it is idiomatic, and it is not in the dictionary, and those three things are perfectly compatible. As to what it denotes, I have no idea, and I will not guess in print. Grammar is my jurisdiction. The referent is yours.”— Rowena Trask, retired senior editor, dictionary citation file, 31 years

On the second phrase she is briefer and, we thought, slightly warmer. Slurp is imitative and reaches English through Dutch. Lean she notes as attested in American use as a mass noun, in a sense she describes as “beverage-adjacent and regionally specific,” and about which she declines to elaborate further. Her closing line on the second phrase is one sentence: “I would want to see it in a second independent source before I would enter it.”

Reality Daily has a second independent source. It is the same broadcast, ten more times.

V. The Tetrad, Computed in Advance

Beneath the confession, and running under the whole of the fifty-one minutes, is the actual subject of the broadcast, which is the sky.

Dr. Ileana Sobczak is an associate professor of observational astronomy at a state university in the mountain west. She took our call on a Wednesday afternoon, spoke to us for fifty-one minutes, which we mention only because we noticed, and was at no point anything other than kind. She did not laugh at the question. This desk has asked a great many specialists a great many foolish questions and we wish to record that she did not laugh.

A lunar tetrad, she explained, is four consecutive total lunar eclipses with no partial eclipse between them. It happens when the geometry of the Moon's orbit, which is inclined about five degrees to the plane of Earth's orbit, brings the full Moon close enough to a node on four consecutive attempts. It is a consequence of arithmetic. The eclipses of 2014 and 2015 fell in a tetrad, and they fell on Jewish holidays because the Hebrew calendar is lunar, and a total lunar eclipse can only occur at full moon, and Passover and Tabernacles begin at full moon. The coincidence is not a coincidence. It is a definition.

She then said the thing this desk has been sitting with since.

“The 2014 and 2015 eclipses were computed and printed decades before they happened. Anybody could have looked them up. Anybody still can — the tables run centuries out in both directions. I'd be glad to send you the file. It's about four megabytes and it is, I think, one of the most beautiful documents human beings have ever produced.”— Dr. Ileana Sobczak, associate professor of observational astronomy

We accepted. The file arrived nineteen minutes later with a one-line note reading “enjoy the 2200s.” It is a beautiful document, and we have printed the relevant pages and pinned them to the corridor wall.

And then we wrote back to Dr. Sobczak with the question that is actually ours, and we print our own question here because it is the hinge of this investigation: a thing being predictable does not tell you what it means. The tide is predictable. The tide has meant a great deal to a great many people. Knowing when the water arrives is not the same as knowing why anyone should care that it does, and the fact that a table exists does not settle a single question about significance, and it is precisely because the table exists and settles nothing that this desk had to go and build a ledger instead.

Dr. Sobczak's reply, in full: “That's fair. That part isn't mine.”

VI. The Reconciliation

Here is the method, and we want it stated plainly because it will be mischaracterized as mockery, and it is not mockery.

Reality Daily treats a prophecy the way it treats an invoice. A claim was declared on a date. A consequence was stated. Time passed. Something was subsequently recorded, or nothing was. That is all a reconciliation is. It is what a bookkeeper does at the end of a month, and a bookkeeper does not sneer at the ledger — a bookkeeper simply wants the two columns to agree, and is troubled when they do not, and keeps working until they do or until somebody signs off on the variance.

We are asking a bookkeeper's question. We are asking it sincerely. Over four weeks, the Standards Desk assembled every publicly declared sign we could source to a date and a stated consequence, from the publication of the blood-moon material in 2013 forward, and set beside each one the outcome recorded by ordinary means — wire copy, the National Weather Service daily record, the trade sales figures, and the calendar.

The ledger does not balance. We want to be careful about what that sentence means and does not mean. It does not mean the signs did not occur; every celestial event in the left-hand columns occurred, on time, exactly as the tables said it would. It means that against eleven declared consequences we could locate one recorded outcome that matched its entry, and that the other ten resolve to no change recorded, to a Tuesday, to four tenths of an inch of rain, to a second printing.

Reality Daily takes no satisfaction in this. A ledger that will not balance is not a joke and it is not a victory. It is a document somebody has to carry. Somewhere there is a person who read the 2013 book and adjusted a life around it, and that person is carrying a variance nobody has signed off on, and the Standards Desk thinks about that person more than it thinks about the broadcast.

One line reconciles. It is the last line, and it is the confession. A man stood up on 16 August and stated that he had done a thing, and the tape records him stating it, and the two agree exactly, eleven times, to the second. It is the only item on this broadcast that reconciles to anything, and we are obliged by our own protocol to mark it CLOSED, and we have.

VII. The Tape, and the Woman in Row Nine

Delmer Fuqua ran broadcast audio for a large church in Texas for twenty-two years and is now retired in Bandera. He did not work on this broadcast and has no connection to this ministry, and he asked us to print both of those facts before anything else he said. We are printing them.

We sent him the file and asked one narrow technical question: is there any edit point in the fifty-one minutes.

He called back in under an hour. A house feed of this kind, he explained, records to a single continuous timecode roll with one unbroken room-mic bed underneath the program mix, and that bed is the thing you cannot fake — the ambient noise floor of a two-thousand-seat room has a signature, and the signature is continuous across the whole fifty-one minutes and forty-four seconds. He confirmed that the choir figure at 22:23 is the actual choir in the actual room, not a bed laid under it in post. He was, on this point, entirely certain and entirely unexcited.

Then he said the flattest thing anybody said to us in nine days.

“There's no edit in it. Nobody put those words in there, and nobody took anything out around them. I ran sound for preachers for twenty-two years, honey, and I never once met one who said a thing eleven times by accident.”— Delmer Fuqua, retired church broadcast engineer, Bandera, Texas

Loretta Bynum-Kessel is seventy-one, a retired school-cafeteria manager, and was in the building that evening in seat 9-C, which she has held for nineteen years. She agreed to speak to us on the telephone for eleven minutes and was gracious for all eleven.

We asked her whether anything in the sermon of 16 August struck her as unusual.

She said no.

We read her the two phrases from our transcript and asked whether she had heard them, and she said that she had, that she had heard them clearly, and that she had understood him perfectly. We asked what she had understood. She said she was not going to explain a sermon to a newspaper. We asked whether she would consider elaborating on the record. She said no, kindly, and asked after the weather in Virginia.

We have no further questions for Mrs. Bynum-Kessel. She was there, she heard it, she understood it, and she is under no obligation whatsoever to translate it for four people in a rented room above a former appliance showroom. Of everyone this desk contacted over nine days, she is the only one who came away from the broadcast with more than she brought to it.

VIII. The Statement, Parsed

Nineteen written requests for comment produced one response, received 27 August at 6:52 p.m. Eastern, sixty-one words, unsigned, from a communications address. We reprint it in full because that is our policy and because sixty-one words is what we were given:

Clause one. We agree that the message speaks for itself and we accept the encouragement to watch it in full. We have watched it in full eleven times. That is the problem. It speaks for itself with total clarity, at length, at volume, and what it says eleven times is the thing at the top of this page.

Clause two. The ministry does not comment on the private history of any believer. Reality Daily did not ask about a private history. We asked about a public broadcast. The history in question was made public by the man himself on his own network, and a thing a man announces to twenty-two hundred people and eleven affiliates has left the category of private history and entered the category of the record.

Clause three. The ministry “does not confirm or characterize language attributed to a broadcast by third parties.” No third party attributed anything. There is no third party in this story. The file is the ministry's file, hosted on the ministry's archive, downloaded from the ministry's server, of the ministry's pastor, and the language is on it. We are not attributing. We are quoting.

Clause four. “The signs remain.” This is the only affirmative claim in the statement, it is offered without a date, without a consequence, and without a mechanism, and it is the only sentence in the sixty-one words we cannot put in the ledger, because a claim with no stated consequence cannot be reconciled against anything. We have opened a category for it. The category has one entry.

IX. What We Are Not Saying

Reality Daily wishes to be exact, because this story will be summarized by people who have not watched the tape.

We are not saying the pastor did anything wrong as a young man. We do not know what he did as a young man. We know what he said he did, in his own words, on his own feed, eleven times, and we have printed those words and no others, and we have added nothing to them.

We are not saying we know what the words mean. We asked a lexicographer of thirty-one years, two seminaries and four of our own staff. The lexicographer told us the phrase is grammatical and declined to go further. The seminaries have not replied. Our own transcribers agreed on nothing except the phrases themselves. We are a broadsheet. We do not know, and we are telling you that we do not know, which is more than has been done with this broadcast anywhere else.

We are not saying the blood moons did not occur. They occurred. They occurred precisely on schedule, on dates printed in a table decades in advance, and Dr. Sobczak sent us that table, and it is on our corridor wall, and it is beautiful.

We are not saying belief is foolish. The congregation of Cornerstone Church is not on trial in this newspaper and never will be. Mrs. Bynum-Kessel understood the sermon of 16 August. Four trained transcribers and a retired dictionary editor did not. That is a fact about us, not about her.

We are not saying the ledger proves anything. A ledger does not prove. A ledger records, and then somebody has to sign it.

And we are not saying the man is insincere. That is the part that has kept this desk here past midnight for nine days running. He does not sound like a man performing. He sounds, at 50:51, with the choir under him and nine seconds of response coming back off two thousand people, like a man telling the truth about himself as plainly as he knows how — in words the English language has not yet issued a dictionary entry for, to a room that did not blink.

X. Conclusion

Fifty-one minutes and forty-four seconds. Eleven occurrences. A mean interval of six point four seconds between the confession and the moon, and a route from one to the other that never once varies across an entire broadcast. Four independent transcripts that agree on almost nothing and on those two phrases absolutely. Two seminaries, twenty-two letters, no reply. One lexicographer who says it is grammatical and will not say what it is. One astronomer who will tell you exactly when the moon turns red for the next four hundred years and who says, correctly and without embarrassment, that the meaning of it is not her department.

And a ledger of eleven declared signs against eleven recorded outcomes, in which the only line that reconciles is the one where a man told the truth about himself.

We would like somebody to sign the variance. We are not particular about who.

■ ■ ■

Reality Daily has offered the ministry unlimited space in which to respond, at any length, in full, unedited, with no commentary from us whatsoever, and specifically including the opportunity to tell this newspaper what the two phrases mean, which is the only thing we have wanted from anybody since 22 August.

We have held that space since 24 August. It remains open, and it will remain open, and if the answer arrives in eleven years it will be printed at the top of this page above everything written here, with our own reporting moved down to make room for it.

Until then, there is the tape. Fifty-one minutes and forty-four seconds, one unbroken timecode roll, no edit point, the room's noise floor continuous from end to end. He said it eleven times. He meant to say it eleven times. And every single time, immediately afterward, he looked up.

Sources & Documentation

1. Broadcast SES-2440, complete program file, 51:44, downloaded from the ministry's public archive 22 August, 4:11 p.m. EDT. SHA-256 hash retained; download log retained; file unaltered.
2. Printed order of service, evening of 16 August, 2 pp. Sermon allotted 34 minutes. Obtained from a person who attended and who asked for nothing.
3. Reality Daily Standards Desk. Timecode Log, SES-2440: Eleven Occurrences with Intervals to First Lunar Reference. 6 pp.
4. Reality Daily Standards Desk. Four Independent Transcriptions of SES-2440, 47:00–48:00, Prepared Without Conferral. 4 documents; no two in agreement on punctuation, sentence boundary or word count; all four in agreement on both quoted phrases.
5. Trask, R. Memorandum on the Formation and Attestation of Two Submitted Phrases. 4 pp. Commissioned by Reality Daily; supplied without context; full memorandum on file.
6. Trask, R. Recorded telephone interview, 26 August, 10:14 a.m. EDT. Transcript 22 pp., reviewed and approved by subject.
7. Sobczak, I., PhD. Recorded telephone interview, 26 August, 2:00 p.m. MDT. Duration 51 minutes.
8. Eclipse canon supplied by Dr. Sobczak, 26 August, 2:19 p.m. MDT, 4.1 MB, covering the years 1501 through 2600. Relevant pages printed and posted in the corridor.
9. Fuqua, D. Recorded telephone interview, 29 August, 9:40 a.m. CDT. Subject confirmed continuity of the room-mic bed across the full program duration and the absence of any edit point.
10. Bynum-Kessel, L. Telephone interview, 30 August, 11 minutes. Subject declined to elaborate and was not pressed.
11. Hagee, J. Four Blood Moons: Something Is About to Change (2013). Publicly available. Consulted for declared signs and stated consequences appearing in the reconciliation.
12. National Weather Service, Bexar County daily climatological record, 08 October 2014. Precipitation: 0.4 in.
13. Wire copy, 15 April 2014, complete day file. Reviewed in full by the Standards Desk. Day was a Tuesday.
14. Trade sales record, weekly religion category, weeks ending 03 October 2015 and 10 October 2015. Second printing recorded.
15. Theological wordbook, 4th ed.; two-volume dictionary of biblical languages; concordance of homiletic usage in North American evangelical preaching, 1870–present; ministry's published glossary, 11 pp. Neither phrase appears in any of the four, in any of the thirty-one spelling variants constructed by this desk.
16. Reality Daily Standards Desk. Record of Written Requests to the Chalmers Institute of Biblical Languages, Rock Hill, S.C. 12 entries. 0 responses.
17. Reality Daily Standards Desk. Record of Written Requests to the Danforth School of Divinity, Erie, Pa. 12 entries. 0 responses.
18. Statement of the ministry, received 27 August, 6:52 p.m. EDT, 61 words, unsigned, from a communications address. Reprinted in full in Section VIII.
19. Reality Daily Standards Desk. Correspondence File RD-C-5522, Requests for Comment to Ministry, Affiliate and Network, 22–31 August. 19 entries; 1 response.
20. Affiliate carriage list, 11 stations, as published by the network in its own promotional material.
21. Reality Daily Legal. Memorandum on Publication of Verbatim Quotation from a Publicly Broadcast Confession. 3 pp.
22. Reality Daily Standards Desk. Vote Record, 31 August: four to one in favour of verbatim publication, both phrases, unaltered, all eleven instances. Dissent recorded by the Editor-in-Chief and withdrawn by her the same evening.
23. Reader Correspondence File RD-C-5523, 906 letters received explaining the phrases to this newspaper. None from a seminary. None cited.
24. Reality Daily Standards Desk. Category of Unreconcilable Claims, opened 1 September. One entry: “The signs remain.”
25. The tape. Fifty-one minutes and forty-four seconds. He said it eleven times.

Reader Response — 5,718 comments

LB

Loretta B.-K. 5 hours ago

I was there. I am the lady in seat 9-C and I told the reporter on the telephone that I understood him perfectly, and I did, and I am not going to explain a sermon in a comment section either. She was very polite about it. It was a good service and the hymn at the end was lovely.

▲ 9,140   ▼ 77  ·  Reply

DF

Delmer F. 4 hours ago

For anybody arguing about this in the replies: the room bed is continuous. You can see it on a spectrogram in about four seconds. There's no splice at 50:51, there's no splice anywhere, and whoever is saying the choir was laid in afterward has never sat behind a console in their life.

▲ 6,802   ▼ 119  ·  Reply

GH

Gerald Hocking 4 hours ago

The eleven timestamps are what did it for me. Anybody can say a thing once. Eleven times with the same interval to the moon every time is not a slip of the tongue, that's a structure.

▲ 4,318   ▼ 203  ·  Reply

AK

A. Kowalczyk 3 hours ago

Respectfully, this is nineteen minutes of reading to establish that a preacher said a phrase you refuse to define and then a table of things that didn't happen. Incredible paper. Never change.

▲ 3,977   ▼ 3,551  ·  Reply

RD

Reality Daily · Standards Desk 3 hours ago

@A. Kowalczyk — Correct on every count, and we would only adjust the emphasis. We refuse to define the phrase because we could not define it, and we said so rather than guessing, which is the difference between this page and the eleven hundred posts that defined it this afternoon without asking anyone. And yes: the table is a list of things that did not happen, set against eleven statements that they would. That is what a reconciliation is. We have added your summary to the correspondence file.

▲ 8,455   ▼ 412  ·  Reply

DM

Denise M. 2 hours ago

I do reconciliations for a living, for a mid-size municipality, and I want to say that the line about somebody having to carry a variance is the truest sentence I have read about my job in twenty-six years. I did not expect to find it in a story about the moon.

▲ 5,610   ▼ 44  ·  Reply

RT

R. Trask 96 minutes ago

The paper has represented my memorandum accurately, including the part where I declined to go further, which several people writing to me privately seem to regard as cowardice. It is not cowardice. It is a citation file with one citation in it. Bring me a second and I will read it.

▲ 4,102   ▼ 58  ·  Reply

J

j_tremaine 51 minutes ago

"Grammar is my jurisdiction. The referent is yours." I am having this printed on a mug and I am sending one to every editor I have ever worked for.

▲ 11,209   ▼ 16  ·  Reply

EP

Eileen Prather 38 minutes ago

Wrote to both seminaries myself this afternoon as a private citizen. Will report back. Somebody in this country has to know what it means and I refuse to believe it is only the lady in seat 9-C.

▲ 2,884   ▼ 61  ·  Reply